The Historical and Political Impact of the Eulenburg Affair in the German Empire
Introduction
This report examines the Eulenburg Affair, a series of legal and social conflicts in the early 20th century involving the close advisors of Kaiser Wilhelm II. It also discusses the recent sale of a porcelain vase linked to these historical figures.
Main Body
On April 24, the Lempertz auction house in Berlin sold a porcelain vase, valued between €300,000 and €450,000. The item is believed to have been a gift from Kaiser Wilhelm II to Prince Philipp of Eulenburg-Hertefeld. This object connects to the Eulenburg Affair, a time of instability in the German Empire. During this period, the Kaiser relied heavily on a small group of advisors who met at Liebenberg castle. Historian Robert Beachy describes these men, including Prince Eulenburg, as having close male friendships that included romantic letters. Political tension grew when critics, especially the nationalist journalist Maximilian Harden, claimed that this group had too much influence over government policy. Harden asserted that leaks from the Liebenberg group during the First Moroccan Crisis (1905-06) damaged Germany's diplomatic position. In November 1906, Harden published an article suggesting that Prince Eulenburg and his friends were homosexual. He used the term 'warm' to describe their orientation and argued that the group was a corrupting influence on the state. These claims led to several public trials. In one case, General Kuno von Moltke sued Harden for libel. During the trial, evidence about von Moltke's private life and marriage was presented. The sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld testified as an expert, emphasizing that sexual orientation is a biological trait rather than a choice. Although Harden won the case, the trials brought Hirschfeld's theories on gender and sexuality to public attention. Historians note that the affair increased homophobia and led to the idea that homosexuality was a sign of 'degeneracy,' which later influenced stricter laws under the Nazi regime. Furthermore, the press used antisemitic language against Harden and Hirschfeld, linking homosexuality to a lack of patriotism. The scandal ended with the professional and social ruin of Prince Eulenburg, who died in isolation in 1921.
Conclusion
The Eulenburg Affair caused a shift in how the public viewed the German monarchy. As a result, it contributed to a climate of social division that existed before Kaiser Wilhelm II eventually gave up his throne in 1918.