Court Says: Name of Man Who Shot Bikie Leader Can Be Told

A2

Court Says: Name of Man Who Shot Bikie Leader Can Be Told

Introduction

A court in Western Australia said a news rule is now gone. The rule stopped people from saying the name of a man. The man killed a bikie leader in 2020. His name is Benjamin Luke Johnston.

Main Body

Benjamin Luke Johnston is 39 years old. He was a soldier and an electrician. He said he killed Nick Martin. Nick Martin was the leader of a bikie group. The court sent Johnston to prison for 20 years. The killing was on December 12, 2020. Johnston used a gun. He shot from far away. The bullet hit Nick Martin in the chest. The bullet also hit Martin''s son-in-law in the arm. The son-in-law did not die from the bullet. He died 16 months later from a different sickness. About 2,000 people were at the place. Johnston helped the police with another man''s trial. The other man''s name is David James Pye. Pye was a friend of Martin. Then he joined a different bikie group. The court said Pye planned the killing. Pye offered Johnston $150,000. Johnston got $100,000. Pye will get his punishment on May 13, 2026. His lawyer wants to change the court''s decision. Johnston asked the court to end the news rule. He said the rule made his life in prison hard. Mail did not come to him. Visitors could not make appointments. He could not start a university class. He said people in prison already knew his name. The judge agreed. He ended the news rule. Now we know more about Johnston. He was a soldier. He started shooting guns when he was 15. He had a gun license. He kept many guns at his home. He worked for a charity in Iraq. He helped with medical training. He had a sickness from bad memories. He wanted a drug called MDMA. This drug started his talk with Pye. Johnston watched Martin for a long time. He used a small flying camera to look at Martin''s home. He shot his gun 200 times in the bush to test it. On the night of the killing, he went through a hole in a fence. He wore camouflage clothes. He waited in the bushes for 10 to 15 minutes. Then he shot. Pye''s lawyer said Johnston is a liar. The lawyer said Johnston told many false stories. There was no proof that Pye did the killing. Only Johnston''s words said Pye did it. Police recordings did not talk about the killing. The prosecution said Pye had a reason. He left one bikie group for another. Both men wanted the other to die. The trial did not have a jury. The court said no jury could be fair.

Conclusion

Now people can say Benjamin Luke Johnston''s name. He is the man who shot Nick Martin. Johnston is still in prison. David Pye waits for his punishment. He will try to change the court''s decision.

Vocabulary Learning

judge
A person who decides the punishment in a court.法官
Example:The judge said the man must go to prison.
killed
To make someone or something die.殺死
Example:The car accident killed two people.
name
The word people call you.名字
Example:My name is Anna.
prison
A place where people who break the law are kept.監獄
Example:He went to prison for ten years.
shot
To fire a gun.開槍
Example:The man shot the gun at the target.

Sentence Learning

A court in Western Australia said a news rule is now gone.
This sentence uses the past simple tense 'said' to report a past event. The phrase 'is now gone' describes a present state.本句使用過去簡單時態'said'來報告過去的事件。短語'is now gone'描述當前的狀態。
The rule stopped people from saying the name of a man.
This sentence uses the verb 'stopped' in the past simple tense. The structure 'stopped someone from doing something' shows prevention.本句使用過去簡單時態的動詞'stopped'。結構'stopped 某人 from 做某事'表示阻止。
The court sent Johnston to prison for 20 years.
This sentence uses the past simple tense 'sent'. The phrase 'for 20 years' indicates the duration of the punishment.本句使用過去簡單時態'sent'。短語'for 20 years'表示懲罰的持續時間。
Johnston helped the police with another man's trial.
This sentence uses the past simple tense 'helped'. The possessive form 'another man's' shows the trial belongs to another man.本句使用過去簡單時態'helped'。所有格形式'another man's'表示審判屬於另一名男子。
The judge agreed and ended the news rule.
This sentence uses two past simple verbs 'agreed' and 'ended' connected by 'and'. This shows two actions that happened in sequence.本句使用兩個過去簡單時態的動詞'agreed'以及'ended',由'and'連接。這表示按順序發生的兩個動作。
B2

Supreme Court Lifts Suppression Order on Identity of Sniper Who Killed Bikie Leader Nick Martin

Introduction

The Supreme Court of Western Australia has lifted a suppression order that previously prevented the media from publishing the name of Benjamin Luke Johnston, the man convicted of murdering former Rebels Motorcycle Club president Nick Martin at the Perth Motorplex in 2020. The order was removed on April 24, 2026, after Johnston requested it.

Main Body

Benjamin Luke Johnston, a 39-year-old former Australian Army reservist and ex-FIFO electrician, pleaded guilty to the murder of Nick Martin. He is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence at an undisclosed high-security facility. The killing occurred on December 12, 2020, at the Kwinana Motorplex. Johnston fired a single shot from a .308-calibre rifle at a distance of 365 meters, striking Martin in the chest. The bullet passed through the victim and hit Martin''s son-in-law, Ricky Chapman, in the arm. Chapman survived the incident but died 16 months later from an unrelated medical condition. Approximately 2,000 people were present at the event. Johnston''s testimony was crucial in the later trial of David James Pye, a former associate of Martin who had switched to the Comancheros Motorcycle Club. Pye was found guilty of planning the murder and encouraging Johnston to kill another rival, Ray Cilli. Johnston testified that Pye offered him $150,000 for the murder of Martin, although he was ultimately paid $100,000. Pye is scheduled for sentencing on May 13, 2026, and his lawyer, Paul Holmes, has stated that he intends to appeal the conviction. In his request to lift the suppression order, Johnston argued that the anonymity order was negatively affecting his life in prison. He claimed that mail was not reaching him, that visitors had difficulty booking appointments, and that the order prevented him from enrolling in a university health and science degree, which required using his legal name. He also stated that he had no fears for his safety, as the prison population already knew who he was. Justice Joseph McGrath, who handled the application, decided that the potential risk to a future retrial was not a strong enough reason to keep the order in place, and he granted the request. Previously hidden details of Johnston''s background have also been released. He served as an artillery gunner in the Australian Army Reserve and started shooting air rifles in his mid-teens. He held a gun license and kept multiple weapons at his home in Waikiki. Johnston worked for the charity Shadows of Hope in Iraq and Kurdistan, where he provided medical training and security advice. He was treated for post-traumatic stress disorder and sought the drug MDMA, which, according to court testimony, led to his first contact with Pye. During Pye''s trial, Johnston described carrying out extensive surveillance on Martin, including using a drone to check the security of Martin''s home and testing his rifle by firing 200 rounds at a target in remote bushland. On the night of the murder, he entered the venue through a hole in a fence, wore camouflage, and waited in a vegetated area for 10 to 15 minutes before firing. Pye''s defense lawyer described Johnston as a pathological and compulsive liar during the trial, pointing out that cross-examination revealed exaggerations and false claims about his past. The defense also argued that no direct evidence, apart from Johnston''s testimony, connected Pye to the murder, and that police recordings of conversations between the two men did not clearly discuss the killing. The prosecution, however, argued that Pye had a clear motive, which came from his move from the Rebels to the Comancheros and a mutual desire for the other''s death. The trial was held without a jury, as the court decided that an impartial jury could not be selected.

Conclusion

The lifting of the suppression order now allows the public to know that Benjamin Luke Johnston is the person who fatally shot Nick Martin. Johnston remains in prison, and David Pye is waiting to be sentenced for his role in the murder, with an appeal of his conviction expected.

Vocabulary Learning

anonymity order
A court order that keeps a person's identity secret from the public.匿名令:一項法院命令,用於對公眾隱瞞某人的身份。
Example:Johnston requested the removal of the anonymity order because it was affecting his prison life.
appeal the conviction
To formally ask a higher court to change or overturn a guilty verdict.對定罪提出上訴:正式請求更高級別的法院更改或推翻有罪判決。
Example:Pye's lawyer stated that he intends to appeal the conviction after sentencing.
cross-examination
The questioning of a witness by the opposing legal team in a trial.盤問:在審判中由對方律師對證人進行的提問。
Example:During cross-examination, the defense lawyer revealed inconsistencies in Johnston's testimony.
pleaded guilty
Formally admitted to committing a crime in a court of law.認罪:在法庭上正式承認犯罪。
Example:Benjamin Luke Johnston pleaded guilty to the murder of Nick Martin.
suppression order
A legal order that prevents the publication or disclosure of certain information.禁止發布令:一項禁止發布或披露特定信息的法律命令。
Example:The Supreme Court lifted the suppression order, allowing the media to name the convicted sniper.

Sentence Learning

The Supreme Court of Western Australia has lifted a suppression order that previously prevented the media from publishing the name of Benjamin Luke Johnston, the man convicted of murdering former Rebels Motorcycle Club president Nick Martin at the Perth Motorplex in 2020.
This sentence uses a relative clause ('that previously prevented...') to define the suppression order, and a noun phrase in apposition ('the man convicted...') to give extra information about Johnston. This structure helps organize complex information clearly.這個句子使用關係從句(「that previously prevented...」)來定義禁制令,並使用同位語名詞短語(「the man convicted...」)來補充約翰斯頓的資料。這種結構有助於清晰地組織複雜資訊。
The order was removed on April 24, 2026, after Johnston requested it.
This sentence uses the passive voice ('was removed') to focus on the action (the removal of the order) rather than who removed it, which is common in formal reporting. The linking word 'after' shows the sequence of events.這個句子使用被動語態(「was removed」)來強調動作(禁制令被解除)而非執行者,這在正式報導中很常見。連接詞「after」顯示事件發生的先後順序。
Johnston testified that Pye offered him $150,000 for the murder of Martin, although he was ultimately paid $100,000.
This sentence uses 'although' to show contrast between the offered amount and the paid amount. The structure 'testified that...' introduces reported speech, making the reporting clear and logical.這個句子使用「although」來對比提議的金額和實際支付的金額。「testified that...」的結構引入間接引語,使報導清晰且有邏輯。
He claimed that mail was not reaching him, that visitors had difficulty booking appointments, and that the order prevented him from enrolling in a university health and science degree, which required using his legal name.
This sentence uses parallel structure with three 'that' clauses to list Johnston's claims clearly. It also includes a non-defining relative clause ('which required...') to add extra detail about the degree. This helps organize multiple reasons in a logical way.這個句子使用三個「that」從句的平行結構來清晰地列出約翰斯頓的主張。它還包含一個非限制性關係從句(「which required...」)來補充關於該學位的額外細節。這有助於以邏輯方式組織多個理由。
Justice Joseph McGrath, who handled the application, decided that the potential risk to a future retrial was not a strong enough reason to keep the order in place, and he granted the request.
This sentence uses a non-defining relative clause ('who handled the application') to identify Justice McGrath. It then uses 'that' to introduce the decision and 'and' to connect the decision with the action taken. This structure clearly shows who did what and why.這個句子使用非限制性關係從句(「who handled the application」)來說明麥格拉斯法官的身份。然後使用「that」引入決定,並用「and」連接決定與採取的行動。這種結構清楚地顯示了誰做了什麼以及原因。
C2

Supreme Court Lifts Suppression Order on Identity of Sniper Who Killed Bikie Leader Nick Martin

Introduction

The Supreme Court of Western Australia has lifted a suppression order that previously prohibited the publication of the name of Benjamin Luke Johnston, the individual convicted of the 2020 murder of former Rebels Motorcycle Club president Nick Martin at the Perth Motorplex. The order was vacated on April 24, 2026, following an application by Johnston.

Main Body

Benjamin Luke Johnston, a 39-year-old former Australian Army reservist and ex-FIFO electrician, pleaded guilty to the murder of Nick Martin. He is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence at an undisclosed high-security facility. The killing occurred on December 12, 2020, at the Kwinana Motorplex, where Johnston fired a single shot from a .308-calibre rifle at a distance of 365 meters, striking Martin in the chest. The bullet passed through the victim and struck Martin''s son-in-law, Ricky Chapman, in the arm; Chapman survived the incident but died 16 months later from an unrelated medical condition. Approximately 2,000 people were present at the event. Johnston''s testimony was instrumental in the subsequent trial of David James Pye, a former associate of Martin who had defected to the Comancheros Motorcycle Club. Pye was found guilty of orchestrating the murder and inciting Johnston to kill another rival, Ray Cilli. Johnston testified that Pye offered him $150,000 for the murder of Martin, though he was ultimately paid $100,000. Pye is scheduled for sentencing on May 13, 2026, and his legal representative, Paul Holmes, has indicated an intention to appeal the conviction. In his application to lift the suppression order, Johnston argued that the anonymity order was negatively affecting his life in prison. He stated that mail was not reaching him, that visitors faced difficulties booking appointments, and that the order prevented him from enrolling in a university health and science degree, which required the use of his legal name. He further claimed he had no fears for his safety, as the prison population was already aware of his identity. Justice Joseph McGrath, who presided over the application, determined that the potential risk to a future retrial did not constitute sufficient grounds to maintain the order and granted the application. Previously suppressed details of Johnston''s background have also been released. He served as an artillery gunner in the Australian Army Reserve and began shooting air rifles in his mid-teens. He held a gun license and kept multiple weapons at his home in Waikiki. Johnston worked for the charity Shadows of Hope in Iraq and Kurdistan, providing medical training and security advice. He was treated for post-traumatic stress disorder and sought the drug MDMA, which, according to court testimony, led to his initial contact with Pye. During Pye''s trial, Johnston described conducting extensive surveillance on Martin, including using a drone to assess the security of Martin''s home and testing his rifle by firing 200 rounds at a target in isolated bushland. On the night of the murder, he entered the venue through a hole in a fence, wore camouflage, and waited in a vegetated area for 10 to 15 minutes before firing. Pye''s defense counsel characterized Johnston as a pathological and compulsive liar during the trial, noting that cross-examination revealed exaggerations and false claims regarding his past. The defense also pointed out that no direct evidence, aside from Johnston''s testimony, connected Pye to the murder, and that police surveillance recordings of conversations between the two men did not explicitly discuss the killing. The prosecution, however, argued that Pye had a clear motive, stemming from his defection from the Rebels to the Comancheros and a mutual desire for the other''s death. The trial was conducted without a jury, as the court determined that an impartial jury could not be empaneled.

Conclusion

The lifting of the suppression order permits the public identification of Benjamin Luke Johnston as the individual who fatally shot Nick Martin. Johnston remains incarcerated, and David Pye awaits sentencing for his role in the murder, with an appeal of his conviction anticipated.

Vocabulary Learning

empaneled
To select and swear in a jury for a trial; the process of constituting a jury.選任陪審團(法律術語):為審判挑選並宣誓就職陪審團的過程。
Example:The trial was conducted without a jury, as the court determined that an impartial jury could not be empaneled.
orchestrating
To plan, organize, or arrange something in a secret or skillful way, often with negative connotations.策劃(貶義):以秘密或巧妙的方式計劃、組織或安排某事,常帶有負面含義。
Example:Pye was found guilty of orchestrating the murder and inciting Johnston to kill another rival, Ray Cilli.
pathological liar
A person who habitually and compulsively tells falsehoods, often with no clear motive, due to a psychological condition.病態說謊者:因心理狀況而習慣性且強迫性地說謊的人,通常沒有明確動機。
Example:Pye's defense counsel characterized Johnston as a pathological and compulsive liar during the trial.
suppression order
A legal directive that prohibits the publication or disclosure of certain information, often to protect a person's identity or ensure a fair trial.禁止令(法律術語):一項禁止公開或披露特定信息的法律指令,通常用於保護個人身份或確保審判公正。
Example:The Supreme Court of Western Australia has lifted a suppression order that previously prohibited the publication of the name of Benjamin Luke Johnston.
vacated
To have a legal decision or order declared null and void; to annul or rescind.撤銷(法律術語):宣告某項法律決定或命令無效;廢除或取消。
Example:The order was vacated on April 24, 2026, following an application by Johnston.

Sentence Learning

The Supreme Court of Western Australia has lifted a suppression order that previously prohibited the publication of the name of Benjamin Luke Johnston, the individual convicted of the 2020 murder of former Rebels Motorcycle Club president Nick Martin at the Perth Motorplex.
This sentence features a complex noun phrase with a defining relative clause ('that previously prohibited...') and a non-restrictive appositive ('the individual convicted...'), which adds specificity and lexical density. The main clause is in the present perfect tense, while the subordinate clause uses past tense, demonstrating tense sequencing for narrative precision.此句包含一個帶有限制性關係從句(「that previously prohibited...」)的複雜名詞短語,以及一個非限制性同位語(「the individual convicted...」),增加了具體性和詞彙密度。主句使用現在完成時,而從句使用過去時,展現了敘事精確性的時態序列。
The bullet passed through the victim and struck Martin's son-in-law, Ricky Chapman, in the arm; Chapman survived the incident but died 16 months later from an unrelated medical condition.
This sentence uses a semicolon to connect two independent clauses, creating a compound structure that contrasts immediate survival with eventual death. The second clause employs a concessive conjunction ('but') and a prepositional phrase ('from an unrelated medical condition') to add nuance and causal detail, typical of high-level narrative cohesion.此句使用分號連接兩個獨立子句,形成複合結構,對比即時生存與最終死亡。第二個子句使用讓步連接詞(「but」)和介詞短語(「from an unrelated medical condition」)增加細微差別和因果細節,屬於高層次敘事連貫性的典型用法。
He further claimed he had no fears for his safety, as the prison population was already aware of his identity.
This sentence features a reduced reporting structure ('He further claimed') followed by a noun clause ('he had no fears...'), and a subordinate clause introduced by 'as' to provide a causal reason. The use of 'as' instead of 'because' adds formality and sophistication, while the past perfect ('was already aware') indicates prior knowledge.此句包含一個簡化的報告結構(「He further claimed」),後接名詞子句(「he had no fears...」),以及由「as」引導的從句提供因果理由。使用「as」而非「because」增加了正式感和複雜性,而過去完成時(「was already aware」)則表示先前的認知。
Justice Joseph McGrath, who presided over the application, determined that the potential risk to a future retrial did not constitute sufficient grounds to maintain the order and granted the application.
This sentence contains a non-restrictive relative clause ('who presided over the application') embedded in the subject, followed by a complex object clause ('that the potential risk... did not constitute...'). The main verb 'determined' governs two parallel actions ('did not constitute' and 'granted'), creating a balanced syntactic structure with formal legal vocabulary.此句包含一個嵌入主語中的非限制性關係從句(「who presided over the application」),後接一個複雜的賓語從句(「that the potential risk... did not constitute...」)。主要動詞「determined」支配兩個平行動作(「did not constitute」和「granted」),形成了平衡的句法結構,並使用了正式的法律詞彙。
The prosecution, however, argued that Pye had a clear motive, stemming from his defection from the Rebels to the Comancheros and a mutual desire for the other's death.
This sentence uses a parenthetical conjunctive adverb ('however') to signal contrast, followed by a that-clause as the object of 'argued'. The phrase 'stemming from...' is a reduced relative clause (present participle phrase) that elaborates on 'motive', while the coordinated noun phrases ('his defection... and a mutual desire...') add lexical density and parallel structure.此句使用插入性連接副詞(「however」)表示對比,後接一個that從句作為「argued」的賓語。短語「stemming from...」是一個縮減的關係從句(現在分詞短語),用以闡述「motive」,而並列的名詞短語(「his defection... and a mutual desire...」)增加了詞彙密度和平行結構。