People and Lawmakers Say No to a Dinner for President Trump
Introduction
On Thursday, a group of people and some U.S. lawmakers stood together in a park in Washington, D.C. They were angry about a dinner. A big company leader, David Ellison, had the dinner for President Donald Trump. The dinner was a private party.
Main Body
The dinner made many people angry. They think Mr. Ellison is too close to President Trump. This is a problem because the government is looking at a big business deal. The deal is a merger. A merger is when two companies become one. The two companies are Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery. The deal is worth a lot of money. Shareholders of Warner Bros. Discovery said yes to the merger. But the government must say yes, too. Lawmaker Jamie Raskin was at the protest. He said the dinner was a rich person''s party for President Trump. He said the dinner was part of a bad plan to help the merger. Another lawmaker, Becca Balint, said she and others were outside asking for answers. She said Mr. Ellison was inside the dinner with President Trump. She called the dinner a party of power and bad behavior. People at the protest said they hope to stop the merger. Some experts think a group of state lawyers will take the companies to court. Norm Eisen was also at the protest. He said the dinner was not a real celebration of free speech. He said the real celebration was outside with the protesters.
Conclusion
The protest shows that many people are watching the big merger. They think the dinner is a sign that media leaders and the president are too close. This is a problem while the government decides about the merger.