Analysis of Indigenous Protocol Disputes During Anzac Day Commemorations
Introduction
This report examines the occurrences of public disruption and the omission of Indigenous recognition ceremonies during recent Anzac Day dawn services across several Australian cities.
Main Body
During dawn services in Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth, audible disapproval was expressed by some attendees during Welcome to Country ceremonies. These disruptions coincided with social media directives from the organization 'Fight for Australia' encouraging supporters to manifest their dissatisfaction with such protocols. In Melbourne, reports indicated the presence of individuals associated with the defunct National Socialist Network. These incidents resulted in one arrest in New South Wales for nuisance and prompted condemnations from Premiers Jacinta Allan and Chris Minns, who characterized the behavior as a breach of the solemnity required for the occasion. Parallel to these disruptions, the Townsville RSL sub-branch elected to exclude both Welcome to Country and Acknowledgement of Country protocols from its service, an event attended by Queensland Premier David Crisafulli. This represents a departure from the 2024 and 2025 protocols which had previously recognized the Bindal and Wulgurukaba peoples. RSL President Colin Mosch stated that the decision was based on a desire to focus exclusively on military sacrifice. This omission drew criticism from Social Justice Commissioner Katie Kiss, who cited the historical contribution of Indigenous servicemen, while Opposition Leader Steven Miles noted that program determination rests with local RSL chapters. From a political perspective, Federal Opposition Leader Angus Taylor expressed disagreement with the act of booing but concurrently posited that the frequent application of Welcome to Country ceremonies has resulted in their devaluation. Taylor suggested a reduction in the frequency of these protocols to restore their significance, a position aligned with previous statements made by Peter Dutton. This discourse occurs within a broader political context involving the 2023 Voice to Parliament referendum and upcoming by-elections in Farrer, where the Coalition is competing with One Nation on platforms concerning nationalism and migration. Analytical interpretations of these events vary by stakeholder. Indigenous academic Marcia Langton and Commissioner Katie Kiss interpret the disruptions and omissions as a lack of respect for First Nations military history. Conversely, some political figures and local organizers frame the issue as one of protocol saturation or a necessity to maintain the singular focus of the commemorative event. The efficacy of proposed measures, such as banning disruptive individuals from future services, remains undetermined due to practical implementation challenges.
Conclusion
The current situation is characterized by a tension between the maintenance of traditional military commemoration and the integration of Indigenous recognition protocols, manifesting in both active public disruption and administrative omission.