More than 130 Important People Write a Letter to Support Palestine Action

A2

More than 130 Important People Write a Letter to Support Palestine Action

Introduction

More than 130 scholars, writers, and activists sent a letter to the UK Court of Appeal. They support the group Palestine Action. The court will soon decide if the government's ban on the group is legal.

Main Body

In July 2025, the UK government said Palestine Action is a terrorist group. This happened after members of the group entered an air force base and caused £7 million in damage. Now, it is illegal to be a member of the group or to support it. People can go to prison for up to 14 years. In February 2025, a High Court said the ban was not legal. But the government did not agree. The government asked a higher court to change the decision. The ban is still in place. The higher court will hear the case on April 28 and 29. The police stopped arresting people after the High Court decision, but then they started again. They arrested more than 500 people at a protest in April. The letter says: 'We oppose genocide, we support Palestine Action.' More than 130 people signed it. Some famous signers are writer Sally Rooney, activist Greta Thunberg, musician Brian Eno, and philosopher Judith Butler. Many professors from universities like Oxford and Cambridge also signed. Some signers gave more comments. One professor said the situation is 'absurd and contradictory.' Another person said the government uses the word 'terrorist' in a wrong way. The Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said she does not agree with the High Court. She thinks the ban is correct. Human rights groups say the government should stop the ban. The signers of the letter could be arrested for supporting a banned group.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal will decide if the ban on Palestine Action stays. The letter from important people shows a big argument between free speech and anti-terrorism laws in the UK.

Vocabulary Learning

court (n.)
a place where judges decide if someone broke the law法院
Example:The Court of Appeal will decide the case.
government (n.)
the group of people who rule a country政府
Example:The UK government banned the group.
illegal (adj.)
not allowed by law非法的
Example:It is illegal to be a member of the group.
protest (n.)
a public show of disagreement抗議
Example:The police arrested people at a protest.
support (v.)
help / to agree with and help someone or something支持
Example:Many people support the group Palestine Action.

Sentence Learning

In July 2025, the UK government said Palestine Action is a terrorist group.
Time Marker: "In July 2025" tells us when the action happened.「In July 2025」告訴我們行動發生的時間。
Now, it is illegal to be a member of the group or to support it.
Time Marker: "Now" shows the current situation.「Now」表示當前的狀況。
But the government did not agree.
Contrast Connector: "But" shows a contrast between two ideas.「But」表示兩個想法之間的對比。
The higher court will hear the case on April 28 and 29.
Time Marker and Prepositional Phrase: "on April 28 and 29" gives the specific dates.「on April 28 and 29」提供了具體的日期。
The police stopped arresting people after the High Court decision, but then they started again.
Time Marker and Contrast Connector: "after" shows sequence, "but then" shows contrast in time.「after」表示順序,「but then」表示時間上的對比。
B2

Over 130 Public Figures Submit Letter to UK Court of Appeal Supporting Palestine Action Ahead of Ban Legality Hearing

Introduction

More than 130 prominent scholars, writers, and activists have submitted a letter to the UK Court of Appeal expressing support for the direct action group Palestine Action, days before a scheduled hearing to determine the legality of the government's ban on the organization.

Main Body

Palestine Action was banned as a terrorist organization in July 2025 under the Terrorism Act, after members entered a Royal Air Force base and caused about £7 million in damage. This ban made it illegal to be a member or show support, with penalties of up to 14 years in prison. In February 2025, a High Court panel of three judges ruled the ban was unlawful and disproportionate. However, the government appealed that decision, and the ban remains in effect while the appeal is pending. The Court of Appeal hearing is scheduled for April 28 and 29. The Metropolitan Police initially said it would stop arrests after the High Court ruling, but later resumed enforcement, arresting over 500 people at a protest earlier in April. The letter, which consists of the sentence 'We oppose genocide, we support Palestine Action,' was signed by over 130 individuals including author Sally Rooney, activist Greta Thunberg, musician Brian Eno, philosopher Judith Butler, and academics from universities such as Oxford, Cambridge, Yale, and Columbia. The letter was published on the website of Defend Our Juries, a civil liberties organization. Several signatories provided statements. Peter Hallward, a professor at Kingston University, described the situation as 'absurd and contradictory' and suggested that widespread defiance could make the law unenforceable. Charles Secrett, former leader of Friends of the Earth, compared the government's use of the term 'terrorist' to Orwellian language abuse. Neve Gordon, an international law professor at Queen Mary University of London, accused the government of silencing messengers and showing moral bankruptcy. Penny Green, also of Queen Mary University, stated that peaceful protesters opposing genocide are being labeled terrorists while the government avoids accountability. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood expressed disagreement with the High Court ruling, asserting that the ban was not disproportionate. Human rights organizations and UN experts have criticized the increasing crackdown on peaceful protests, urging the government to reverse the ban. The signatories risk arrest under the Terrorism Act for expressing support for a banned organization.

Conclusion

The upcoming Court of Appeal hearing will determine whether the ban on Palestine Action is upheld. The letter from prominent figures highlights ongoing tensions between freedom of expression and anti-terrorism legislation in the UK.

Vocabulary Learning

accountability (n.)
the fact of being responsible for one's actions問責;責任
Example:The government avoids accountability for its actions.
defiance (n.)
open resistance or bold disobedience反抗;挑釁
Example:Widespread defiance could make the law unenforceable.
disproportionate (adj.)
too large or too small in comparison to something else不成比例的;過度的
Example:The High Court ruled the ban was disproportionate.
legality (n.)
the state of being lawful合法性
Example:The hearing will determine the legality of the ban.
prominent (adj.)
well-known and important著名的;重要的
Example:More than 130 prominent scholars signed the letter.

Sentence Learning

Palestine Action was banned as a terrorist organization in July 2025 under the Terrorism Act, after members entered a Royal Air Force base and caused about £7 million in damage.
Passive Voice + Time clause with 'after': This sentence uses the passive voice ('was banned') to emphasize the action (banning) rather than the actor. The time clause 'after members entered...' provides context for the ban. This structure is common in formal reporting to focus on events.被動語態 + 時間從句 with 'after': 此句使用被動語態('was banned')以強調行動(禁止)而非行動者。時間從句 'after members entered...' 提供禁令的背景。此結構常見於正式報導,以聚焦事件。
The letter, which consists of the sentence 'We oppose genocide, we support Palestine Action,' was signed by over 130 individuals including author Sally Rooney, activist Greta Thunberg, musician Brian Eno, philosopher Judith Butler, and academics from universities such as Oxford, Cambridge, Yale, and Columbia.
Relative clause (which) + Passive voice (was signed): The relative clause 'which consists of...' adds extra information about the letter without starting a new sentence. The passive voice 'was signed' shifts focus to the letter and the signatories. This combination allows for concise, detailed description.關係從句 (which) + 被動語態 (was signed): 關係從句 'which consists of...' 在不另起新句的情況下補充信件資訊。被動語態 'was signed' 將焦點轉向信件及簽署人。此組合能簡潔而詳細地描述。
However, the government appealed that decision, and the ban remains in effect while the appeal is pending.
Contrast linking word 'However' + Time conjunction 'while': The linking word 'However' signals a contrast between the High Court ruling and the government's action. 'While' introduces a simultaneous condition (the appeal is pending). These connectors help organize contrasting and simultaneous ideas clearly.對比連接詞 'However' + 時間連詞 'while': 連接詞 'However' 標示高等法院裁決與政府行動之間的對比。'While' 引入同時發生的條件(上訴待決)。這些連接詞有助清晰組織對比及同時發生的意念。
Peter Hallward, a professor at Kingston University, described the situation as 'absurd and contradictory' and suggested that widespread defiance could make the law unenforceable.
Appositive noun phrase + That-clause for reported speech: The appositive 'a professor at Kingston University' identifies Peter Hallward's role. The 'that' clause reports his suggestion. This structure is useful for introducing a person and then presenting their opinion in a single sentence.同位語名詞短語 + That-從句用於轉述: 同位語 'a professor at Kingston University' 說明 Peter Hallward 的身份。'that' 從句報告他的建議。此結構有助於在一個句子中介紹人物並呈現其意見。
The signatories risk arrest under the Terrorism Act for expressing support for a banned organization.
Preposition 'for' + gerund phrase to indicate reason: The phrase 'for expressing support' uses a gerund after the preposition 'for' to explain the reason for risking arrest. This is a common way to express purpose or cause in English.介詞 'for' + 動名詞短語表示原因: 短語 'for expressing support' 在介詞 'for' 後使用動名詞,解釋冒著被捕風險的原因。這是英語中表達目的或原因的常見方式。
C2

Over 130 Public Figures Submit Letter to UK Court of Appeal Supporting Palestine Action Ahead of Ban Legality Hearing

Introduction

More than 130 prominent scholars, writers, and activists have submitted a letter to the UK Court of Appeal expressing support for the direct action group Palestine Action, days before a scheduled hearing to determine the lawfulness of the government's ban on the organization.

Main Body

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization in July 2025 under the Terrorism Act, following an incident in which members entered a Royal Air Force base and caused approximately £7 million in damage. This designation rendered membership in or expression of support for the group illegal, with penalties of up to 14 years' imprisonment. In February 2025, a High Court panel of three judges ruled the ban unlawful and disproportionate. However, the government appealed that decision, and the proscription remains in effect pending the appeal. The Court of Appeal hearing is scheduled for April 28 and 29. The Metropolitan Police initially announced it would cease arrests following the High Court ruling but subsequently resumed enforcement, arresting over 500 individuals at a protest earlier in April. The letter, consisting of the sentence "We oppose genocide, we support Palestine Action," was signed by over 130 individuals including author Sally Rooney, activist Greta Thunberg, musician Brian Eno, philosopher Judith Butler, and academics from institutions such as the University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, Yale University, and Columbia University. The letter was published on the website of Defend Our Juries, a civil liberties organization. Several signatories provided statements. Peter Hallward, a professor at Kingston University, described the situation as "absurd and contradictory" and suggested that widespread defiance could render the law unenforceable. Charles Secrett, former leader of Friends of the Earth, compared the government's use of the term "terrorist" to Orwellian language abuse. Neve Gordon, an international law professor at Queen Mary University of London, accused the government of silencing messengers and demonstrating moral bankruptcy. Penny Green, also of Queen Mary University, stated that peaceful protesters opposing genocide are being branded terrorists while the government avoids accountability. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood expressed disagreement with the High Court ruling, asserting that the ban was not disproportionate. Human rights organizations and UN experts have criticized the escalating crackdown on peaceful protests, urging the government to reverse the proscription. The signatories risk arrest under the Terrorism Act for their expression of support for a proscribed organization.

Conclusion

The upcoming Court of Appeal hearing will determine whether the ban on Palestine Action is upheld. The letter from prominent figures highlights ongoing tensions between freedom of expression and anti-terrorism legislation in the UK.

Vocabulary Learning

accountability (n.)
the fact or condition of being responsible for one's actions and decisions問責性;責任
Example:Penny Green stated that peaceful protesters opposing genocide are being branded terrorists while the government avoids accountability.
crackdown (n.)
a severe or repressive measure or series of measures against a particular group or activity嚴厲打擊;鎮壓
Example:Human rights organizations and UN experts have criticized the escalating crackdown on peaceful protests.
disproportionate (adj.)
too large or too small in comparison with something else; not proportionate不成比例的;不相稱的
Example:A High Court panel of three judges ruled the ban unlawful and disproportionate.
proscribe (v.)
to officially forbid something; to denounce or condemn禁止;譴責
Example:Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization under the Terrorism Act.
proscription (n.)
the act of forbidding or outlawing something禁止;取締
Example:The proscription remains in effect pending the appeal.

Sentence Learning

The letter, consisting of the sentence 'We oppose genocide, we support Palestine Action,' was signed by over 130 individuals including author Sally Rooney, activist Greta Thunberg, musician Brian Eno, philosopher Judith Butler, and academics from institutions such as the University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, Yale University, and Columbia University.
Reduced Relative Clause: This sentence uses a reduced relative clause (consisting of...) to modify 'the letter', and an appositive list of signatories. The passive voice 'was signed' shifts focus to the letter. The long enumeration demonstrates high lexical density.這個句子使用了簡化關係從句(consisting of...)來修飾「the letter」,並以同位語列出簽署者。被動語態「was signed」將焦點轉移到信件本身。長列舉展現了高詞彙密度。
Penny Green, also of Queen Mary University, stated that peaceful protesters opposing genocide are being branded terrorists while the government avoids accountability.
Participial Phrase and Passive Progressive: This sentence features a participial phrase 'opposing genocide' acting as a reduced relative clause (who oppose genocide). The passive progressive 'are being branded' emphasizes ongoing action. The while-clause contrasts the protesters' treatment with government inaction.這個句子包含分詞短語「opposing genocide」作為簡化關係從句(反對種族滅絕的人)。被動進行式「are being branded」強調正在進行的行為。while從句對比抗議者的待遇與政府的不作為。
The Metropolitan Police initially announced it would cease arrests following the High Court ruling but subsequently resumed enforcement, arresting over 500 individuals at a protest earlier in April.
Participial Phrase and Contrastive Coordination: This sentence uses a participial phrase 'arresting over 500 individuals' to describe the result or manner of resuming enforcement. The contrastive conjunction 'but' links two actions. The temporal adverbs 'initially' and 'subsequently' add nuance.這個句子使用分詞短語「arresting over 500 individuals」來描述恢復執法的結果或方式。對比連詞「but」連接兩個行動。時間副詞「initially」和「subsequently」增加了細微差別。
Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization in July 2025 under the Terrorism Act, following an incident in which members entered a Royal Air Force base and caused approximately £7 million in damage.
Relative Clause and Participial Phrase: This sentence contains a relative clause 'in which members entered...' specifying the incident. The participial phrase 'following an incident' provides temporal context. The passive voice 'was proscribed' highlights the action on the organization.這個句子包含關係從句「in which members entered...」來具體說明事件。分詞短語「following an incident」提供時間背景。被動語態「was proscribed」強調對該組織的行動。
Neve Gordon, an international law professor at Queen Mary University of London, accused the government of silencing messengers and demonstrating moral bankruptcy.
Apposition and Gerund Phrase: This sentence uses an appositive noun phrase to identify Neve Gordon. The structure 'accused someone of gerund phrases' is a common pattern. The gerunds 'silencing' and 'demonstrating' act as nouns, describing the alleged actions.這個句子使用同位語名詞短語來識別Neve Gordon。結構「accused someone of 動名詞短語」是常見模式。動名詞「silencing」和「demonstrating」充當名詞,描述被指控的行為。