Court Says Police Must Pay Two Men for Handcuffing Them

Introduction

The Bombay High Court told the state government to pay ₹50,000 each to a lawyer and a former soldier. The police handcuffed them. The court said this was wrong and hurt their dignity.

Main Body

Two judges, Justices Urmila Joshi-Phalke and Nivedita Mehta, made the decision. They said the police must follow the law and respect people''s rights. The court said the police have a duty to everyone. When the police do bad things, people stop trusting the law. The government must pay the money in eight weeks. The two men are lawyer Yogeshwar Kawade and former soldier Avinash Date. The court said the police treated them very badly. This cannot happen to any person in India. The two men went to a police station in August 2010. They wanted to report a problem. Someone broke Date''s car. The other person then said the two men hurt him. The police took the two men after midnight. They made them take off their clothes. They made them sit in their underwear. The next day, the police put handcuffs on them. They took them on a bus to a court. The judge at the court took off the handcuffs and let them go. The two men said the police did a bad thing. They were not criminals. The police chief said the bad police officers got in trouble. But the High Court said that was not enough. The court said when the police break the law, they must pay money. This is the right thing to do.

Conclusion

The Bombay High Court said the police must pay the two men. This shows that the police must always respect people''s dignity. Just punishing the bad police officers is not enough.

Vocabulary Learning

court
A place where a judge decides if someone did something wrong.法庭
Example:The court said the police must pay money.
handcuff
To put metal rings on a person's wrists to stop them from moving their hands.戴上手銬
Example:The police handcuffed the two men.
hurt
To cause pain or make someone feel bad.傷害
Example:The police hurt their dignity.
pay
To give money for something.付款
Example:The government must pay the two men.
wrong
Not correct or not good.錯誤的
Example:Handcuffing them was wrong.

Sentence Learning

The Bombay High Court told the state government to pay ₹50,000 each to a lawyer and a former soldier.
This sentence has a subject 'The Bombay High Court', a verb 'told', and an object 'the state government'. The phrase 'to pay' shows the action the government must do.本句的主語是 'The Bombay High Court',動詞是 'told',受詞是 'the state government'。'to pay' 這個短語表示政府必須做的行動。
The police handcuffed them.
This is a simple past tense sentence. 'The police' is the subject, 'handcuffed' is the past tense verb, and 'them' is the object.這是一個簡單的過去式句子。'The police' 是主語,'handcuffed' 是過去式動詞,'them' 是受詞。
They said the police must follow the law and respect people's rights.
This sentence uses 'said' to report what someone spoke. 'Must' shows a strong rule or duty. 'Follow' and 'respect' are two actions the police need to do.本句使用 'said' 來報告某人說過的話。'Must' 表示一項強制規則或義務。'Follow' 以及 'respect' 是警察需要做的兩個動作。
When the police do bad things, people stop trusting the law.
This sentence has two parts. 'When the police do bad things' tells the time or condition. 'People stop trusting the law' is the result. 'Stop trusting' means to no longer have faith.本句有兩個部分。'When the police do bad things' 說明時間或條件。'People stop trusting the law' 是結果。'Stop trusting' 的意思是失去信任。
The judge at the court took off the handcuffs and let them go.
This sentence has a subject 'The judge', a place 'at the court', and two actions: 'took off' (removed) and 'let them go' (allowed them to leave).本句有主語 'The judge'、地點 'at the court',以及兩個動作:'took off'(取下)以及 'let them go'(釋放他們)。