UK Businesses Expect Food Inflation to Reach 7% in 2026, Bank of England Survey Shows

Introduction

A survey by the Bank of England has revealed that UK businesses now expect food inflation to reach 6–7% during 2026, a higher estimate than earlier predictions. This assessment is based on company feedback about rising energy, transport, and agricultural costs, made worse by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

Main Body

The Bank of England’s latest report on business conditions, published on 24 April, gathered opinions from company contacts. Respondents stated that consumer goods inflation is still concentrated in food prices, which had risen 3–4% year-on-year. Although uncertainty is high, concerns about food inflation are stronger than for other goods due to higher input costs. Contacts expressed concern that food inflation would increase through 2026, potentially to 6–7%, rather than declining as previously forecast. Official data released on Wednesday showed that food and non-alcoholic drink prices rose 3.7% annually in March, an increase from 3.3% in February. A separate projection from the Food & Drink Federation (FDF), a UK trade association, offered a more pessimistic outlook. FDF chief economist Dr Liliana Danila claimed that the conflict in the Middle East has caused a cost shock too large for manufacturers to fully absorb. She noted that long-term contracts between manufacturers, suppliers, and retailers can delay the passing on of higher costs by up to a year, but prices for less processed goods or shorter supply chains will adjust more quickly. Without government intervention, the FDF expects a gradual but steady increase in food inflation, reaching approximately 9–10% by the end of 2026. Furthermore, the Bank of England’s Decision Maker Panel (DMP) survey, covering the three months to April, found that finance chiefs across UK companies expect to raise their own prices by an average of 3.8% over the next 12 months—0.3 percentage points higher than the prediction for the three months to March. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of respondents indicated they would adjust to the recent energy shock by increasing prices. Separate research by the Bank’s agents across the UK confirmed these concerns, with businesses citing the Middle East conflict’s potential impact on demand, supply chains, and input costs. However, the agents noted that, aside from a small number of firms trading directly with the region, few reported significant effects on output or activity so far. Other sectors have also expressed worries about rising transport and energy costs, suggesting that inflationary pressures are not limited to food. The Bank’s report described the conflict as having reduced confidence that the economy would improve later in the year, though the direct economic disruption remains limited for most firms.

Conclusion

In summary, UK businesses and trade bodies expect a notable increase in food inflation during 2026, due to higher input costs and geopolitical instability. While the Bank of England’s survey points to a rise to 6–7%, the Food & Drink Federation projects an even steeper climb to 9–10%. The difference reflects varying assumptions about the speed and extent of cost pass-through, as well as the potential for government intervention. The outlook remains highly uncertain and depends on the evolution of energy prices, supply chain dynamics, and the Middle East conflict.

Vocabulary Learning

absorb (v.)
withstand / to take in or bear a cost or impact承受
Example:The conflict has caused a cost shock too large for manufacturers to fully absorb.
assessment (n.)
evaluation / a judgment or opinion about something評估
Example:This assessment is based on company feedback about rising costs.
concentrated (adj.)
focused / directed towards a particular area or thing集中
Example:Consumer goods inflation is still concentrated in food prices.
intervention (n.)
involvement / the act of interfering or stepping in to change a situation干預
Example:Without government intervention, the FDF expects a gradual increase in food inflation.
pessimistic (adj.)
gloomy / expecting the worst possible outcome悲觀的
Example:A separate projection offered a more pessimistic outlook for food inflation.

Sentence Learning

Respondents stated that consumer goods inflation is still concentrated in food prices, which had risen 3–4% year-on-year.
Relative clause 'which had risen 3–4% year-on-year' provides additional information about food prices, making the sentence more informative without starting a new sentence.關係從句「which had risen 3–4% year-on-year」補充說明食品價格的資訊,使句子更完整,無需另起一句。
This assessment is based on company feedback about rising energy, transport, and agricultural costs, made worse by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.
Passive voice 'is based' and 'made worse' shift focus to the assessment and the costs, not the doer, which is common in formal reporting to emphasize the result.被動語態「is based」和「made worse」將重點放在評估和成本上,而非動作執行者,常見於正式報告以強調結果。
Although uncertainty is high, concerns about food inflation are stronger than for other goods due to higher input costs.
Linking word 'Although' introduces a concession, then the main clause states the stronger concern, showing contrast between uncertainty and specific worry.連接詞「Although」引出让步,主句說明更強烈的擔憂,顯示不確定性與具體憂慮之間的對比。
Contacts expressed concern that food inflation would increase through 2026, potentially to 6–7%, rather than declining as previously forecast.
Linking phrase 'rather than' contrasts the expected decline with the actual increase, highlighting a change in prediction.連接短語「rather than」將預期的下降與實際上升作對比,突出預測的變化。
However, the agents noted that, aside from a small number of firms trading directly with the region, few reported significant effects on output or activity so far.
Linking word 'However' signals a shift from previous concerns, and 'aside from' introduces an exception, showing that the impact is limited except for a few firms.連接詞「However」表示與前文擔憂的轉折,「aside from」引出例外情況,顯示除了少數公司外影響有限。