Former Channel 5 News Presenter Withdraws Employment Tribunal Claims Against ITN, Channel 5, and Co-Presenter Dan Walker Following Settlement
Introduction
Claudia-Liza Vanderpuije, a former presenter for Channel 5 News, has withdrawn all allegations of sexism, misogyny, and workplace bullying that she had brought against her former co-presenter Dan Walker, as well as her employers ITN and Channel 5. The withdrawal occurred on the fifth day of the employment tribunal hearing at the London Tribunals Centre, after a settlement was reached between the parties. No evidence from either side was heard, and the settlement includes no admission of liability.
Main Body
The claims, which had been filed by Ms. Vanderpuije, included allegations of unfair dismissal, discrimination, and harassment. The case had attracted significant attention due to the high-profile nature of the individuals involved and the substantial financial sums initially demanded. According to sources close to the proceedings, Ms. Vanderpuije’s legal team had previously sought £4 million in compensation, and at an earlier stage had demanded £13 million from ITN and its parent company, Paramount. The final settlement amount has not been disclosed, but sources indicate it is “significantly less” than the £4 million figure. Furthermore, the settlement does not require the respondents to cover Ms. Vanderpuije’s legal costs, which have been described as “very high.” The legal action had been ongoing for at least two years, and Ms. Vanderpuije had changed legal representation during that period. Mr. Walker, who co-hosted Channel 5 News with Ms. Vanderpuije from 2022 to 2023, had consistently denied the allegations. His legal team submitted more than 50 character witness statements to the tribunal, including testimonials from figures such as Zoe Ball, Myleene Klass, and various athletes and BBC journalists. In April 2024, Mr. Walker had been “completely exonerated” following an internal workplace investigation into “serious misconduct” related to Ms. Vanderpuije’s complaints; sources familiar with that inquiry stated that a lack of evidence supported the claims and that Mr. Walker had fully cooperated. In a statement posted on Instagram, Mr. Walker expressed that he felt he should not have been drawn into the case but was prepared to defend himself at the tribunal. He also noted his continued concern for Ms. Vanderpuije’s wellbeing and expressed hope that she would find peace. A source close to Mr. Walker indicated that he would have preferred the hearing to proceed. A spokesperson for Ms. Vanderpuije confirmed that a mutual agreement had been reached with ITN and Channel 5, and that she fully withdrew her allegations against Mr. Walker, with no intention to repeat or pursue them. The spokesperson did not provide further details on the terms of the settlement. ITN and Channel 5 each issued statements denying the claims and expressing satisfaction that the matter had been resolved. Channel 5 specifically noted that all allegations relating to Mr. Walker had been withdrawn. Sources associated with the case offered interpretations of Ms. Vanderpuije’s decision to settle after months of refusal. Some suggested that she had been unable to block certain claims or information from being presented in the tribunal. Others posited that her initial grievances were directed at ITN and Channel 5, not Mr. Walker, and that she had previously indicated to him that her issues with management predated his arrival. According to these sources, Ms. Vanderpuije had been on good terms with Mr. Walker until she was informed of her redundancy in autumn 2023. The sources further alleged that Ms. Vanderpuije had sought to increase the profile of her case by including Mr. Walker as a respondent, a view that was not corroborated by official statements.
Conclusion
The withdrawal of all allegations and the settlement bring an end to the employment tribunal proceedings without any judicial determination of the merits of the claims. The parties have moved to resolve the dispute privately, with no admission of liability from any side. The outcome leaves the factual basis of the allegations unadjudicated, and the financial terms of the settlement remain confidential.