The Fishpool Hoard: A Medieval Gold Discovery in Nottinghamshire and Its Complex Aftermath
Introduction
In March 1966, construction workers in Ravenshead, Nottinghamshire, discovered a large collection of medieval gold coins and jewellery while digging for a new housing estate. This collection, known as the Fishpool Hoard, contains over 1,200 coins and nine pieces of jewellery. It is the largest group of medieval gold coins ever found in the United Kingdom. The discovery led to a series of events, including workers temporarily keeping the items, accusations of police wrongdoing, a coroner's inquest, and ongoing historical research into the hoard's origins.
Main Body
The discovery happened on a normal workday when a mechanical digger, operated by John Craughwell, uncovered a large amount of gold from the soil during final excavation for a cul-de-sac. Witnesses, including 17-year-old Pete Hawkins and foreman Jim Flint, reported that workers first gathered handfuls of coins and took them home. According to Flint's account published in The Times, his share was quite heavy. The next day, journalists, police, and dealers from London arrived at the site. Flint, along with colleagues Alfred Martin, Michael Blythe, and Craughwell, later gave the items to authorities after washing them and realizing the size of the find. Soon, accusations emerged that not all coins had been returned. People noticed a difference between the number handed to local police constable Howard Taylor and the official record. Taylor was suspended while an investigation took place, but he was later cleared of any wrongdoing. The coroner, Claude Mack, during the December 1966 inquest, called Craughwell a 'self-confessed liar' and criticized Flint for not being honest after burying 21 coins in his garden. Mack sent the case to the Director of Public Prosecutions, but no further charges were brought against the workers. Only lorry driver Bernard Beeton and seven-year-old David Welham, who had voluntarily handed in coins, were allowed by the jury to keep a share. Beeton sold 85 coins for £85,000; Welham's four coins raised £1,075 and earned him an appearance on the children's programme Blue Peter. Elina Screen, a curator at the British Museum, studied the hoard. She determined that the coins were from the 1350s to 1464, with the latest date providing an important clue. Screen pointed out that 1464 was during the Wars of the Roses, specifically the Lancastrian rebellion led by King Henry VI and Queen Margaret, which ended in defeat at the Battle of Hexham. She noted that 18% of the coins came from France, Scotland, and Burgundy—areas where the Lancastrian court had sought funding—suggesting the hoard may have been part of Henry VI's war funds. Andy Gaunt of Mercian Archaeology Services explained the burial site's location within Sherwood Forest, a royal hunting area near Newstead Priory, a possible stop for travellers. He suggested that the person who buried the hoard, perhaps a fleeing Lancastrian or a Yorkist, hid it in a remote place with the intention of returning later, a plan that clearly did not succeed. The hoard's value at the time was estimated at £440, which Screen said was equal to 36.5 years' wages for a skilled worker or the price of a small-to-medium manor. Shortly after discovery, market estimates reached £500,000. The hoard was later given its own display case at the British Museum and was named one of the top ten British treasures in 2003. Ravenshead Parish Council has confirmed plans to install a commemorative plaque on a wall at Cambourne Gardens, the site of the discovery, to mark the 60th anniversary. A small display already exists in Ravenshead Library. Some questions remain, such as the identity of the original owner and the true identity of Hewlitt Cosgrove Thompson, a person who sold more than 50 pieces of the hoard and then disappeared from historical records.
Conclusion
The Fishpool Hoard is still an important archaeological and historical discovery, connecting a normal construction project to the larger history of 15th-century English dynastic conflict. Although the value of the hoard has been calculated and its historical context partly understood, the identities of both the original owner and a later dealer remain unknown. The upcoming plaque will serve as a public recognition of the discovery's importance to local and national heritage.