The Fishpool Hoard: A Medieval Gold Discovery in Nottinghamshire and Its Complex Aftermath
Introduction
In March 1966, construction workers in Ravenshead, Nottinghamshire, unearthed a substantial cache of medieval gold coins and jewellery while excavating for a new housing estate. Designated the Fishpool Hoard, this collection of over 1,200 coins and nine pieces of jewellery constitutes the largest assemblage of medieval gold coins ever recorded in the United Kingdom. The discovery initiated a sequence of events involving the temporary retention of items by workers, allegations of police misconduct, a coroner’s inquest, and ongoing historical inquiry into the hoard’s origins.
Main Body
The discovery occurred on a routine workday when a mechanical digger, operated by John Craughwell, released a shower of gold from the soil during final excavation for a cul-de-sac. Witnesses, including 17-year-old Pete Hawkins and foreman Jim Flint, reported that workers initially gathered handfuls of coins and took them home. According to Flint’s account published in The Times, the weight of his share was considerable. The following day, media representatives, police, and dealers from London arrived at the site. Flint, along with colleagues Alfred Martin, Michael Blythe, and Craughwell, subsequently surrendered the items to authorities after washing them and recognizing the scale of the find. Accusations soon emerged that not all coins had been returned. A discrepancy was noted between the number handed to local police constable Howard Taylor and the official record. Taylor was suspended pending investigation but was later exonerated. The coroner, Claude Mack, during the December 1966 inquest, characterized Craughwell as a “self-confessed liar” and criticized Flint for failing to be honest after burying 21 coins in his garden. Mack forwarded the case to the Director of Public Prosecutions, but no further legal action was taken against the workmen. Only lorry driver Bernard Beeton and seven-year-old David Welham, who had voluntarily handed in coins, were permitted by the jury to retain a share. Beeton sold 85 coins for £85,000; Welham’s four coins raised £1,075 and earned him an appearance on the children’s programme Blue Peter. Historical analysis of the hoard was conducted by Elina Screen, a curator at the British Museum. She dated the coins from the 1350s to 1464, with the latest date providing a key clue. Screen noted that 1464 corresponds to the Wars of the Roses period, specifically the Lancastrian rebellion led by King Henry VI and Queen Margaret, which culminated in defeat at the Battle of Hexham. She observed that 18% of the coins originated from France, Scotland, and Burgundy—regions where the Lancastrian court had sought funding—suggesting the hoard may have been part of Henry VI’s war chest. Andy Gaunt of Mercian Archaeology Services contextualized the burial site within Sherwood Forest, a royal hunting area near Newstead Priory, a potential stopover for travellers. He proposed that the depositor, possibly a fleeing Lancastrian or a Yorkist, buried the hoard in a secluded location with the intention of later retrieval, a plan that evidently failed. The hoard’s contemporary value was estimated at £440, which Screen equated to 36.5 years’ wages for a skilled tradesman or the purchase price of a small-to-medium manor. Shortly after discovery, market estimates reached £500,000. The hoard was subsequently allocated a dedicated cabinet at the British Museum and was listed among its top ten British treasures in 2003. Ravenshead Parish Council has confirmed plans to install a commemorative plaque on a wall at Cambourne Gardens, the site of the discovery, to mark the 60th anniversary. A small display already exists in Ravenshead Library. Remaining questions include the identity of the original depositor and the true identity of Hewlitt Cosgrove Thompson, an individual who sold more than 50 pieces of the hoard and subsequently disappeared from historical records.
Conclusion
The Fishpool Hoard remains a significant archaeological and historical find, linking a routine construction event to the broader context of 15th-century English dynastic conflict. While the hoard’s material value has been assessed and its historical context partially clarified, the identities of both the original owner and a later intermediary dealer persist as unresolved elements. The forthcoming plaque will serve as a public acknowledgment of the discovery’s importance to local and national heritage.