Israeli High Court Orders Removal of State Benefits for Haredi Draft Evaders
Introduction
The High Court of Justice in Israel has ordered the government to apply financial and criminal penalties against ultra-Orthodox men who avoid mandatory military service. The court stated that the government has failed to enforce existing laws regarding conscription.
Main Body
The court's order, issued on April 26, requires the state to create clear methods for removing public subsidies from those who evade the draft. For example, the Labor Ministry and the Israel Land Council must decide within 21 days how to link subsidized housing and childcare benefits to a person's military status. Additionally, other ministers have 35 days to decide on removing discounts for public transport and municipal taxes. The court emphasized that these actions are not intended as punishments, but rather as the withdrawal of benefits from people who have not met their legal duties. This decision follows previous rulings, including a June 2024 judgment which asserted that the government cannot ignore the Security Service Law. The current order was issued after the state failed to follow a November 2025 directive to create an enforcement policy. Although the government argued that the issue should be solved through new laws, the court rejected this claim, noting that previous legislative promises had not been kept. Furthermore, the court highlighted a serious manpower shortage in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) during the current conflict. Data shows that about 76,000 men of draft age are currently evaders, and roughly 80% of them are from the Haredi community. The court criticized the lack of enforcement, noting that very few evaders were arrested between January 2025 and January 2026. While groups like Israel Hofsheet claimed the decision is necessary for legal equality and national security, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has tried to maintain exemptions for the ultra-Orthodox community to keep his governing coalition stable. Critics describe these efforts as a way to allow 'draft dodging'.
Conclusion
The state must now provide an update on its progress to the court by June 1. This marks a shift from legal discussions to the actual enforcement of the draft law.