Police Investigate Italian Football Referees
Police Investigate Italian Football Referees
Introduction
Police in Milan are looking at some football referees. They think some leaders lied or cheated in games.
Main Body
Two leaders, Gianluca Rocchi and Andrea Gervasoni, left their jobs in April 2026. They left so the police can do their work. A former referee said there were problems in May 2025. Police think Gianluca Rocchi changed the results of games. They have a video from a game between Udinese and Parma. In the video, Rocchi talks to other referees to change a penalty decision. He also picked specific referees for Inter Milan games. Inter Milan says they did not do anything wrong. The club president says the team is not part of this. The coach does not want to talk about the police case. He wants to win the league title. The Sports Minister wants the truth. He says everyone must follow the same rules. The football federation is now looking for new leaders to run the referees.
Conclusion
The police are still working. Gianluca Rocchi will talk to the police on April 30.
Vocabulary Learning
Sentence Learning
Investigation into Alleged Sporting Fraud in Italian Refereeing
Introduction
The Milan Public Prosecutor's Office has started an investigation into suspected sporting fraud involving senior officials of the Italian Referees Association (AIA). As a result, several key leaders have suspended themselves from their roles.
Main Body
The legal inquiry focuses on Gianluca Rocchi, the referee designator for Serie A and Serie B, and Andrea Gervasoni, the VAR supervisor. Both officials resigned on April 26, 2026, to allow the legal process to move forward. The investigation began after a complaint from former assistant referee Domenico Rocca in May 2025, who claimed there were systemic irregularities. Although the FIGC Federal Prosecutor, Giuseppe Chinè, stated that an initial sporting investigation was dismissed in July 2025, the Milan Prosecutor is now checking if these actions are criminally relevant. Prosecutors are specifically examining whether Rocchi improperly influenced match results and referee assignments during the 2024-25 season. For example, they are reviewing a match between Udinese and Parma on March 1, 2025, where video evidence suggests Rocchi spoke with VAR officials from outside the official booth to influence a penalty decision. Furthermore, it is claimed that Rocchi manipulated assignments for Inter Milan by choosing specific referees to avoid unfavorable officiating in certain matches. Inter Milan's management has denied any involvement. President Beppe Marotta asserted that the club is not part of these events, noting that the team actually suffered from several poor refereeing decisions last season. While coach Cristian Chivu refused to comment on the legal case, reports suggest the club is frustrated that past controversies are being brought up again. Meanwhile, Sports Minister Andrea Abodi has called for transparency, as some fear this situation could be as serious as the 2006 Calciopoli scandal.
Conclusion
The investigation is still continuing, and Gianluca Rocchi is expected to be questioned on April 30. The Milan Public Prosecutor will decide whether these events were isolated mistakes or part of a larger system of fraud based on the evidence.
Vocabulary Learning
Sentence Learning
Investigation into Alleged Sporting Fraud within Italian Refereeing Administration
Introduction
The Milan Public Prosecutor's Office has initiated an investigation into suspected sporting fraud involving senior officials of the Italian Referees Association (AIA), leading to the self-suspension of key leadership figures.
Main Body
The judicial inquiry centers on Gianluca Rocchi, the referee designator for Serie A and Serie B, and Andrea Gervasoni, the VAR supervisor. Both officials resigned their positions on April 26, 2026, to facilitate the legal process. The investigation was prompted by a May 2025 complaint from former assistant referee Domenico Rocca, which alleged systemic irregularities. While the FIGC Federal Prosecutor, Giuseppe Chinè, stated that an initial sporting investigation into these claims was dismissed in July 2025, the Milan Prosecutor is now examining the matter for potential criminal relevance. Specific allegations against Rocchi involve the improper influence of match outcomes and official assignments during the 2024-25 season. Prosecutors are scrutinizing a March 1, 2025, match between Udinese and Parma, where video evidence allegedly shows Rocchi communicating with VAR officials from outside the designated booth to influence a penalty decision. Furthermore, it is alleged that Rocchi manipulated referee assignments for Inter Milan, specifically appointing Andrea Colombo for a match against Bologna and avoiding the appointment of Daniele Doveri for a Coppa Italia fixture to prevent perceived unfavorable officiating. Inter Milan's administration has expressed detachment from these allegations. President Beppe Marotta stated that the club is uninvolved and noted that several refereeing decisions from the previous season were objectively adverse to the team. Coach Cristian Chivu has similarly declined to comment on the judicial proceedings, maintaining a focus on the club's current pursuit of the Scudetto. Despite this, reports indicate the club is experiencing frustration due to the timing of the investigation and the resurgence of past controversial incidents, such as an unawarded penalty against Roma and a foul involving Alessandro Bastoni against Verona. From an institutional perspective, the situation has drawn the attention of Sports Minister Andrea Abodi, who has called for transparency and equal treatment in the handling of these allegations. The potential for systemic failure has led to comparisons with the 2006 Calciopoli scandal. Currently, the FIGC is considering temporary leadership replacements, with Maurizio Ciampi identified as a likely candidate to oversee refereeing operations.
Conclusion
The investigation remains ongoing, with Gianluca Rocchi scheduled for questioning on April 30. The final determination of whether these incidents represent isolated irregularities or a systemic fraud will depend on the evidence processed by the Milan Public Prosecutor.